WORLD PRACTICE OF STIMULATING "GREEN" ENERGY
##semicolon##
Green energy, Germany, China, policy, innovation, public-private partnership, renewable energy, sustainable developmentAbstrak
This article compares the experiences of Germany and China in stimulating green energy. Germany has achieved significant success through long-term policies, innovation, and public-private partnerships. China leads in green energy through large-scale and dynamic planning, substantial government investments, and centralized coordination. The article analyzes the approaches and outcomes of both countries and provides recommendations for other nations.
##submission.citations##
REN21. (2021). Renewables 2021 Global Status Report.
Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34(3), 256-276.
IEA. (2020). International Energy Agency. Renewable Energy Market Report.
IRENA. (2019). International Renewable Energy Agency. Innovation Landscape for a Renewable-Powered Future.
Lema, R., & Ruby, K. (2007). Between fragmented authoritarianism and policy coordination: BMWi. (2021). Energiewende: The Energy Transition.
UNFCCC. (2015). The Paris Agreement.
DOE. (2021). Department of Energy. Renewable Energy Programs.
DIW Berlin. (2020). Economic Impact of Renewable Energy in Germany.
UBA. (2021). German Environment Agency. Environmental Impact of Renewable Energy.
CDB. (2021). China Development Bank. Renewable Energy Financing.
CPIA. (2021). China Photovoltaic Industry Association. Annual Report.
CREEI. (2021). China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute. Energy Storage and Grid Integration.
CRES. (2021). China Renewable Energy Society. Industry Report.
