HUDUDIY RIVOJLANISHNING KOʻP OʻLCHOVLI INTEGRAL INDEKSINI QURISHDA INDIKATORLARNI TANLASH VA NORMALLASHTIRISH USULLARINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH
Keywords:
integral indeks, indikatorlar tanlash, normallashtirish, koʻp oʻlchovli oʻlchov, hududiy rivojlanish, Monte-Karlo simulyatsiyasi, vazn berishAbstract
Koʻp oʻlchovli integral indeks yordamida hududiy rivojlanishni oʻlchash metodologiyasida indikatorlarni tanlash va normallashtirish bosqichlari muhim metodologik oʻrin tutishini ushbu ilmiy maqola koʻrsatib berdi. Muallif OECD/JRC uslubiyati, Eurostat va Stiglitz komissiyasi tavsiyalari asosida indikatorlarni tanlashning toʻrtta asosiy mezoni - nazariy asoslanganlik, maʼlumotlar mavjudligi, oʻlchash imkoni va oʻzaro mustaqillik - tizimli ravishda tavsiflab chiqdi. Min-maks normallashtirish, standartlashtirish (z-ball), meʼyoriy masofaga asoslangan yondashuv va fuzzy toʻplamlar usuli bir-biriga nisbatan qiyosiy tahlil etildi. Asosiy komponentlar tahlili asosida vazn berish hamda "shubha foydasiga" (Benefit of the Doubt) modelining metodologik imkoniyatlari baholandi. Monte-Karlo simulyatsiyasi orqali barqarorlik baholashning indeks sifatiga taʼsiri ochib koʻrsatildi va hududlararo taqqoslash uchun universal metodologik ramka taklif qilindi.
References
OECD/JRC. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide. OECD Publishing, Paris. 2008. 162 p. URL: https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf
Nardo M., Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S. Tools for Composite Indicators Building. EUR 21408 EN. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. 2005. 131 p. URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC31473
Greco S., Ishizaka A., Tasiou M., Torrisi G. On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness // Social Indicators Research. 2019. Vol. 141, № 1. P. 61-94. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1832-9
Mazziotta M., Pareto A. On a Generalized Non-compensatory Composite Index for Measuring Socio-economic Phenomena // Social Indicators Research. 2016. Vol. 127, № 3. P. 983-1003. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0998-2
Decancq K., Lugo M.A. Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview // Econometric Reviews. 2013. Vol. 32, № 1. P. 7-34. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2012.690653
Foster J.E., McGillivray M., Seth S. Composite Indices: Rank Robustness, Statistical Reliability and Redundancy // Econometric Reviews. 2013. Vol. 32, № 1. P. 35-56. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2012.690647
Alkire S., Foster J. Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement // Journal of Public Economics. 2011. Vol. 95, № 7-8. P. 476-487. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
Stiglitz J.E., Sen A., Fitoussi J.P. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Paris. 2009. 291 p. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/118025/118123/Fitoussi+Commission+report
Saltelli A. Composite Indicators between Analysis and Advocacy // Social Indicators Research. 2007. Vol. 81, № 1. P. 65-77. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-0024-9
Freudenberg M. Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A Critical Assessment // OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. 2003/16. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/405566708255
Booysen F. An Overview and Evaluation of Composite Indices of Development // Social Indicators Research. 2002. Vol. 59, № 2. P. 115-151. URL: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016275505152
Cherchye L., Moesen W., Rogge N., Van Puyenbroeck T. An Introduction to 'Benefit of the Doubtʼ Composite Indicators // Social Indicators Research. 2007. Vol. 82, № 1. P. 111-145. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7
UNDP. Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier — Human Development and the Anthropocene. United Nations Development Programme. 2020. 412 p. URL: https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2020
Annoni P., Dijkstra L. EU Regional Competitiveness Index 2013. EUR 26060 EN. European Commission, JRC Technical Reports. 2013. 138 p. URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC84922
Zanella A., Camanho A.S., Dias T.G. Undesirable Outputs and Weighting Schemes in Composite Indicators Based on Data Envelopment Analysis // European Journal of Operational Research. 2015. Vol. 245, № 2. P. 517-530. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.036
Saisana M., Tarantola S. State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development. EUR 20408 EN. European Commission, JRC. 2002. 72 p. URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC24276
Bandura R. A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2008 Update. UNDP/ODS Working Paper. 2008. 84 p. URL: https://web.undp.org/sites/default/files/undp-country-composite-indices.pdf
Sen A. Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland, Amsterdam. 1985. 130 p. ISBN: 9780444877307.
Eurostat. Regions in Europe: 2022 Interactive Edition. Publications Office of the European Union. 2022. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/regions-and-cities/publications
World Bank. World Development Indicators Database. 2024. URL: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
Moran P.A.P. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena // Biometrika. 1950. Vol. 37, № 1/2. P. 17-23. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2332142
Cerioli A., Zani S. A Fuzzy Approach to the Measurement of Poverty // In: Dagum C., Zenga M. (eds.) Income and Wealth Distribution, Inequality and Poverty. Springer, Berlin. 1990. P. 272-284. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84250-4_18
Ravallion M. Troubling Tradeoffs in the Human Development Index // Journal of Development Economics. 2012. Vol. 99, № 2. P. 201-209. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.01.003
Gan X., Fernandez I.C., Guo J., Wilson M., Zhao Y., Zhou B., Wu J. When to Use What: Methods for Weighting and Aggregating Sustainability Indicators // Ecological Indicators. 2017. Vol. 81. P. 491-502. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.068
Saisana M., Saltelli A., Tarantola S. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques as Tools for the Quality Assessment of Composite Indicators // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A. 2005. Vol. 168, № 2. P. 307-323. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x
